Skip to main content

What evil looks like

Generally, people who do evil things don’t look any different than those who do good things. They smile and laugh. They eat. They sleep. They enjoy hobbies or activities. They watch TV or movies. They listen to music. They work. They love. They have friends. They have families. They do all of the normal things you and I do.

You may know people who have done evil, whether you know about it or not, whether they have been caught or not. You may walk by strangers that look normal, but have committed heinous acts. You may be one such person yourself. Not all evil is big. Much of it is small. But small things often lead to bigger.

“S/he seemed like a nice person,” the neighbors always say when some evil is found out and the person arrested.

Evil doesn't look like a movie villain! It hides in plain sight.

Evil people didn’t start that way. Have you ever seen a baby and thought, “wow, that kid is the next Hitler for sure!” NO! Of course not! Each child is innocent, and although they definitely come with their own built-in personality, the knowledge, values, and experiences they acquire, coupled with the choices they make are what molds them into who they become.

Put another way, every evil person could have made choices to become a good person.

You may know someone who could have become evil - someone who suffered abuse at the hands of supposed loved ones - who decided that the abuse ends with them and they would not perpetuate that abuse. They could have chosen differently. They could have chosen evil. They chose good.

This gives us hope that none of us has a fate not of our own choosing.

So how do people become evil?

The simple answer is: one small choice after another.

Just as the building of a skyscraper takes many, many steps to complete, our character likewise takes any number of steps to complete, with the formative and early adult years being the most critical. Few people change dramatically in their later adult years without serious effort.

The known histories of most evil people do not detail all of those little steps. Most such steps are private. Most such steps may be unknown to others. A lie here. Breaking a commitment there - even to oneself. Such acts cultivate selfishness. Justifications for increasingly bad behaviors are easier the more important one feels relative to others. Denial of responsibility also contributes. If one claims an evil act is because someone else "made them", or because "that's the way it is", or "I had no choice", it aids in justification to oneself.

Another avenue to evil is how malleable the brain is. By repeating almost any act, one can wire one’s brain to trigger the pleasure response when doing that act. This can be done with mundane and harmless things - like eating or drinking something that is an “acquired” taste - meaning, eating/drinking something any child or non-cultural-native would think tastes like garbage. It can also be done with disgusting and heinous things - like causing the pain of animals, for example.

Similarly, proper emotional responses to things can be encouraged or diminished. Compassion or cruelty can be the result of either trying to feel what the other person feels, or in taking pleasure at their misery. There is a choice there, though it may not be obvious.

Once small steps toward evil are taken, like pride, selfishness, or heartlessness, bigger steps become easier. You’ve seen it in the news before. A killer may have started with bugs, then mice and rats, then larger pets, before finally making the step to humans.

Police officers have made similar steps. They began viewing those not in their uniform as ‘other’, or ‘enemy’. From there, they feel superior. They feel they have some authority or that they ARE the authority. They abuse that power in small ways at first, then more and more, until they are planting evidence, making false arrests, shaking down shop owners for cash, stealing evidence, and so on. In police states, they may justify detaining civilians for no reason, or because a neighbor made a claim the person talked against the state. From there, imprisonment, starvation, torture and murder are a common result.

Soldiers also can find themselves taking these steps. We have ample examples in the history books of mass murder, rapes, torture, and even cannibalism.

All of the people who have done these things started out the same as you and me. They could have chosen good. Why didn’t they, and what does it take to ensure one doesn’t choose evil?

While there are a lot of reasons people choose evil, there are two main reasons good people choose evil when pressure mounts: fear and convenience (or expediency).

Consider the abused child. For the duration of the abuse, they feel helpless to do anything about it. They fear every encounter. As a result, once they are old enough to perpetrate the same acts upon others, that fear has worked in them a dire need to feel control and they exert that control by abusing others.

Consider the Nazi police officers of WW2 Germany. There were some who were already policemen when the Nazis rose to power. They saw what happened to those who spoke out, so to protect their own lives, and maybe their family’s, they kept their mouths shut, then did what they were told. They felt it was expedient to not rock the boat. But they were also fearful of what would happen if they didn't follow orders. Eventually, they would round up Jews and other dissidents and ship them to concentration camps or kill them.

There are two things that people must have in order to become good people: an understanding of evil and good, and courage to choose good.

Consider those who operated the Underground Railroad before the US Civil War. They had courage to do something they knew was right despite grave consequences if they were discovered.

Consider Viktor Frankl who decided in a Nazi concentration camp that although all of his outward liberties were taken from him, that he remained the master of his mind and his emotions and did what kindnesses he could for other prisoners.

When we think of evil, we often think of great leaders that managed the killing of thousands or even millions of people. But did they kill all of those people? No, of course not. It took followers who actually did the acts, and like their leaders, they all started out as normal people. So are the leaders any more evil than those who acted out their wishes? How can they be?

So what does evil look like? It looks like you and me.

USA and Allies

Why don't I include the USA and its allies like the UK? The fact of the matter is that the Presidents, the Generals, the Admirals, and other top leaders were all in agreement that atrocities should not take place, and war should be fought using certain rules. The war crimes that were committed seem to have been done on an individual or unit level, against standing orders. That said, it seems those who broke the stated standards were usually not punished enough for what they did. Middle-leadership was too lenient and also kept many details from upper-leadership.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II

That said, there is a group within the US that I will add at some point in the future. That group is perhaps the cause of just as much pain and misery throughout the world as any of the others I have already covered, so I shouldn't skip them.

Communism

Modern dictionaries and Wikipedia seem to want to paint Communism in a positive light. I don't know why. Communism is responsible for more human death and misery than Fascism was, and continues to ruin lives today. I can only conclude that it appeals to the power-hungry and the foolish. Take these definitions from Meriam-Webster:


"1 a: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed
b: a theory advocating elimination of private property
2 a: a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Soviet Union
b: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production
c: a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably
d: communist systems collectively" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/communism)

Notice how definitions 1a and 1b sound so nice. Wouldn't we all like "goods...available to all as needed"? At least Webster included definition 2b, which is closer to the truth. But Webster's dictionary of 1963 told it closer to how it is really is, "a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production with the professed aim of establishing a stateless society." And yet every experiment shows that without a profit incentive, mankind won't work unless at the end of a whip.  But it does not reveal all that communism has done, none of it good. Further investigation, preferably from primary sources of people who lived and escaped it are best. I encourage you to do so. Communism is not a romantic notion; it is a horror in practice. There is no "if it was just done right, it would work."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

 

Fascism

Modern dictionaries miss the mark when defining Fascism. The definitions are too short and the words they use hide deeper meanings. Take for example this one from Meriam-Webster: "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism)

It is better to read longer treatments from encyclopedias or sources dedicated to history - and preferably, not produced recently, but closer to the actual events, so that those who lived through events can inform us of what actually happened.

One key aspect of fascism was how it permeated every aspect of German and Italian culture in the 1930s and 1940s. From business, to social clubs, everything had to do with supporting the state. Dissent was not tolerated. If you weren't enthusiastic, you at least had to keep quiet or you could be subject to reprisals. It was forced unity.

But the number one point, which is also the number one point of communism, is the elimination of the idea of self-determination and autonomy - of freedom, of democracy, etc. Both philosophies are authoritarian. Both are in direct opposition to the principles the U.S. was founded on. Both promise outcomes of peace and prosperity which cannot result from the methods they advocate. It is impossible.