Skip to main content

Conscience

We all are born with an innate gift called conscience. It tells us right from wrong. While we may or may not agree where it comes from and what influences it, it is, nevertheless, there in each of us.

If we listen to it, we will not make so many mistakes. We will not harm others in the ways that humans can. We will innately keep the 10 commandments, or at least those in which we interact with others.

Or we can dampen it and ignore it, and in so doing become less than we could be, to become degraded, more like animals than angels.

If you have ever had to 'find your courage' to do something you knew was wrong - bend to peer pressure, steal a little, tell a lie, cheat on your significant other, hit someone, or any number of other things - then you actively dampened and ignored your conscience. A marker of this is if you felt bad, if you regretted the action, afterward, even if you didn't in the moment. Sometimes, perhaps often times, the bad thing feels great while you're doing it. But after, when you are alone in your thoughts, regret comes.

The solution to this, if you don't want to listen to your conscience, is to keep doing the wrong things. Eventually, your conscience will stop talking to you. You will become unable to hear it. But the trail of destruction left in your wake will be evidence enough that you've taken wrong paths. And the darkness others can see in your eyes is testimony of what you have done too. If they give you a good look, they can see your selfishness and the damage your choices have made.

The better solution is to stop doing whatever you're doing that you know you shouldn't - to listen to that conscience and do what is right, even when it is hard. In contrast to 'finding your courage' when you do something wrong, when you find courage to do what is right, you feel great afterward, and lastingly so. You feel strong. You feel powerful. And deep inside you know it is the way to live. There is a light in the eyes of such people which is missing in the eyes of those who ignore conscience.

When I think about these two paths, I think of several examples we all know. First, I think of hurting others physically. We all know it is wrong. Our consciences tell us so. If they don't, it is because we have damped its influence for too long. I recently saw a video of over a dozen teens beating one other teen. Severe injury to the head and brain was the result. In another example, death was the result. These videos are popping up more and more. The disturbing thing is the teens do it for fun and usually one who is participating is the one filming. At such young ages, they have dampened their consciences to the point I can't call these animals human. They aren't fit to be in a civilized society since they aren't civilized. They should be permanently incarcerated, at least. There is no rehabilitating one who will not listen to conscience.

I've also seen teens and young adults hitting random strangers in public. Also, theft and destruction of vehicles. Mobs robbing stores. And a host of other things.

A seemingly more mild but no less damaging choice is to have a lot of sexual partners. While it affects both men and women, it affects women to a greater degree. It takes, some studies show, as few as 3 partners for women to lose the ability to pair bond. What that means is that long term commitment becomes impossible, or nearly so. And that makes stable marriages and families also nearly impossible. Women initiate over 80% of divorces and recent data indicates the majority do so because they simply want 'more' than they have, masked as "unreconcilable differences". What they do have isn't good enough, no matter how good the circumstances. A pursuit of pleasure results in never being satisfied. This applies to other realms too, of course.

In fact, men have it worse when it comes to pornography. Even regular users have bouts of their conscience reminding them they should not be watching what they watch. They feel guilty. And if they do not overcome their habits and addictions, they too will be unable to pair bond. They will see women as tools of gratification, not partners to cherish. And as with any addiction, other aspects of their lives suffer as well.

While most people today want to pretend that there are no natural consequences for our actions, especially those bad actions that aren't expressly illegal, the fact of the matter is that every action has one or more natural consequences that follow and we cannot choose what they are. We can only choose whether to commit those acts or not, good or bad. It was once explained to me this way: if you pick up the tail of a snake, you get the whole snake, and if it's a viper, it will bite you, and the poison will unavoidably enter your blood stream, and unless remedied, you will die. If the snake is a constrictor, you may not notice it's wrapping around you and cutting of your air and circulation until it is too late. Either way, it is better to not pick up snakes, but fluffy bunnies instead.

Some may play with snakes and boast that they haven't been bitten - yet. Does that make it less wise if there is a guarantee you'll eventually die from it? As with any analogy, this one isn't perfect; I know as well as you that there are real-life snake handlers that are perfectly fine and in no danger of dying, but you get the idea of what the analogy is meant to convey. We choose our actions, but not our consequences, and do so at our own risk.

USA and Allies

Why don't I include the USA and its allies like the UK? The fact of the matter is that the Presidents, the Generals, the Admirals, and other top leaders were all in agreement that atrocities should not take place, and war should be fought using certain rules. The war crimes that were committed seem to have been done on an individual or unit level, against standing orders. That said, it seems those who broke the stated standards were usually not punished enough for what they did. Middle-leadership was too lenient and also kept many details from upper-leadership.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II

That said, there is a group within the US that I will add at some point in the future. That group is perhaps the cause of just as much pain and misery throughout the world as any of the others I have already covered, so I shouldn't skip them.

Communism

Modern dictionaries and Wikipedia seem to want to paint Communism in a positive light. I don't know why. Communism is responsible for more human death and misery than Fascism was, and continues to ruin lives today. I can only conclude that it appeals to the power-hungry and the foolish. Take these definitions from Meriam-Webster:


"1 a: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed
b: a theory advocating elimination of private property
2 a: a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Soviet Union
b: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production
c: a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably
d: communist systems collectively" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/communism)

Notice how definitions 1a and 1b sound so nice. Wouldn't we all like "goods...available to all as needed"? At least Webster included definition 2b, which is closer to the truth. But Webster's dictionary of 1963 told it closer to how it is really is, "a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production with the professed aim of establishing a stateless society." And yet every experiment shows that without a profit incentive, mankind won't work unless at the end of a whip.  But it does not reveal all that communism has done, none of it good. Further investigation, preferably from primary sources of people who lived and escaped it are best. I encourage you to do so. Communism is not a romantic notion; it is a horror in practice. There is no "if it was just done right, it would work."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

 

Fascism

Modern dictionaries miss the mark when defining Fascism. The definitions are too short and the words they use hide deeper meanings. Take for example this one from Meriam-Webster: "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism)

It is better to read longer treatments from encyclopedias or sources dedicated to history - and preferably, not produced recently, but closer to the actual events, so that those who lived through events can inform us of what actually happened.

One key aspect of fascism was how it permeated every aspect of German and Italian culture in the 1930s and 1940s. From business, to social clubs, everything had to do with supporting the state. Dissent was not tolerated. If you weren't enthusiastic, you at least had to keep quiet or you could be subject to reprisals. It was forced unity.

But the number one point, which is also the number one point of communism, is the elimination of the idea of self-determination and autonomy - of freedom, of democracy, etc. Both philosophies are authoritarian. Both are in direct opposition to the principles the U.S. was founded on. Both promise outcomes of peace and prosperity which cannot result from the methods they advocate. It is impossible.